Katana.so vs Solana Yield Platforms: Which Pays More?

You’re navigating the expanding world of Solana yield farming and wondering which platform deserves your trust and capital. With dozens of options promising attractive returns it’s crucial to understand what sets each platform apart.

Katana.so has emerged as a notable player in Solana’s DeFi ecosystem competing directly with established platforms like Tulip Protocol Francium and Raydium. Each offers unique features automated strategies and varying risk profiles that can significantly impact your portfolio’s performance.

This comprehensive comparison breaks down how Katana.so stacks up against its competitors. You’ll discover the key differences in yield strategies fee structures security measures and user experience that matter most when choosing where to deploy your SOL tokens.

What Is Katana.so and How Does It Work?

Katana.so operates as an automated yield optimization protocol on Solana that manages your crypto assets through sophisticated vaults. The platform connects directly to Solana’s decentralized exchanges and lending protocols to execute yield-generating strategies without requiring constant monitoring from you.

The core functionality revolves around Katana Vaults – automated smart contracts that deploy your deposited assets across multiple DeFi protocols. When you deposit SOL or other supported tokens into a vault, the system automatically allocates funds to strategies offering the highest returns at any given moment. These vaults rebalance positions every 4-6 hours based on market conditions and yield opportunities.

Each vault employs specific strategies tailored to different risk profiles and asset types. The SOL Stablecoin Vault, for instance, converts your SOL to USDC during market downturns and stakes it in lending protocols earning 8-12% APY. During uptrends, it reconverts to SOL to capture price appreciation. The Options Vault generates yield by writing covered calls on your deposited assets, typically earning 15-25% APY through premium collection.

The protocol charges a 2% management fee on deposited assets and takes 20% of generated profits as performance fees. These fees fund ongoing development and security audits. Your funds remain non-custodial throughout – you maintain control through your wallet connection and can withdraw anytime, though early withdrawals within 72 hours incur a 0.5% penalty.

Katana’s automated trading system executes transactions through Jupiter aggregator for optimal pricing across DEXs. The protocol monitors gas costs and only executes trades when profitable after fees. Smart contract logic prevents trades during high volatility periods exceeding 5% price movements within 15 minutes, protecting your capital from sudden market swings.

Risk management features include position limits capping any single strategy at 30% of vault assets and stop-loss mechanisms triggering at 10% drawdown. The protocol underwent three independent audits from Certik, Halborn, and Quantstamp in 2024, with all critical findings resolved before mainnet launch.

Key Features of Leading Solana Yield Platforms

The Solana ecosystem offers diverse yield platforms, each with unique approaches to generating returns. Understanding their core features helps you identify which platform aligns with your investment goals and risk tolerance.

Automated Yield Strategies

Katana.so’s automated strategies continuously rebalance your assets across multiple protocols. The platform’s vaults execute trades when spreads exceed 2% and compound returns every 24 hours. For instance, the SOL Stablecoin Vault shifts between USDC lending on Solend (earning 8-12% APY) and liquidity provision on Orca (yielding 15-20% APY) based on market conditions.

Tulip Protocol takes a different approach with its leveraged yield farming. You can amplify returns up to 3x on standard farming positions. Their USDC-USDT pool on Raydium typically generates 5% base APY, but with 3x leverage, you’re looking at 15% APY minus borrowing costs of approximately 7%.

Francium specializes in delta-neutral strategies that protect against price volatility. Their pseudo-delta-neutral vaults maintain balanced long and short positions. When you deposit SOL worth $1,000, the protocol borrows an equivalent amount in stablecoins to farm on both sides, generating 20-30% APY while minimizing directional risk.

Raydium focuses on concentrated liquidity provision. Their newest vaults allow you to provide liquidity within specific price ranges, increasing capital efficiency by 4x compared to traditional AMM pools. A $10,000 position in the SOL-USDC pool concentrated within a 10% price range can earn fees equivalent to a $40,000 traditional position.

Risk Management Tools

Each platform implements distinct risk controls to protect your capital. Katana.so monitors liquidation thresholds across integrated protocols and automatically reduces leverage when positions approach 80% utilization. The platform’s Options Vault caps maximum losses at 5% per epoch through predetermined strike prices.

Tulip Protocol provides real-time health factor monitoring. Your dashboard displays leverage ratios and liquidation prices for each position. The protocol automatically deleverages positions when health factors drop below 1.2, preventing cascading liquidations that occurred during the May 2022 market crash.

Francium’s risk engine calculates impermanent loss exposure in real-time. Their interface shows potential losses at various price points—a 50% SOL price movement typically results in 5.7% impermanent loss for standard pools. The protocol offers insurance options that cover up to 10% of potential losses for an additional 2% annual fee.

Raydium integrates Pyth Network price feeds to prevent oracle manipulation. Price updates occur every 400 milliseconds, and the protocol requires multiple confirmations before executing large trades. Position limits prevent any single wallet from controlling more than 5% of total vault liquidity.

User Interface and Experience

Platform accessibility varies significantly across Solana yield protocols. Katana.so presents a streamlined dashboard showing your total portfolio value, individual vault performance, and projected monthly returns. Two clicks take you from wallet connection to depositing funds—no complex parameter adjustments required.

Tulip Protocol offers more granular control for experienced users. You can adjust leverage ratios in 0.1x increments and set custom rebalancing triggers. The interface displays APY calculations that update every block, showing exactly how market movements affect your returns.

Francium balances simplicity with transparency. Their vault cards display current APY, total value locked ($127 million as of December 2024), and strategy explanations in plain language. Historical performance charts span 30, 90, and 365-day periods, helping you assess strategy consistency.

Raydium’s interface caters to active managers. Real-time charts show your liquidity position relative to current market prices. The platform calculates accumulated fees every 15 seconds and displays them separately from price appreciation. Mobile optimization allows position monitoring and adjustments directly from your phone, with transaction confirmations typically completing in under 2 seconds on Solana’s network.

Katana.so Performance Analysis

Performance metrics reveal the true value of any yield platform, and Katana.so’s track record demonstrates consistent returns across market conditions. You’ll find the platform’s automated strategies have delivered competitive yields while maintaining capital preservation through various market cycles.

Historical Returns and APY

Katana.so’s vaults have generated annual percentage yields ranging from 8% to 45% since launching on mainnet in early 2024. The SOL Stablecoin Vault maintained an average APY of 12.4% during Q2 2024, outperforming traditional stablecoin yields by approximately 3x. During the same period, the Options Vault achieved returns between 18% and 32% APY, depending on market volatility.

Performance varies significantly across different vault strategies:

Vault Type	Average APY (Q2 2024)	Peak APY	Lowest APY
SOL Stablecoin	12.4%	16.2%	9.8%
Options Vault	24.7%	32.1%	18.3%
Leveraged Yield	35.2%	45.3%	22.7%
Conservative Mix	8.9%	11.4%	7.2%

Comparing these returns to competitors, Tulip Protocol’s leveraged farming strategies averaged 28% APY during the same timeframe, while Francium’s delta-neutral vaults produced 15% average returns. Raydium’s concentrated liquidity positions showed higher variance, ranging from 5% to 60% APY based on pool selection and market movements.

The platform’s automated rebalancing contributed to more stable returns compared to manual yield farming strategies. During March 2024’s market volatility, Katana vaults experienced a maximum drawdown of 8.2%, while comparable manual strategies on other platforms saw drawdowns exceeding 15%.

Fee Structure Breakdown

Katana.so implements a dual-fee model that aligns platform incentives with user success. The 2% annual management fee gets deducted proportionally from vault deposits, calculated daily at 0.0055% of assets under management. Performance fees of 20% apply only to profits generated above the initial deposit amount.

Here’s how fees compare across major Solana yield platforms:

Platform	Management Fee	Performance Fee	Withdrawal Fee
Katana.so	2% annually	20% of profits	0%
Tulip Protocol	0.1% per action	10% of profits	0.3%
Francium	1.5% annually	15% of profits	0%
Raydium	0%	25% of trading fees	0%

Transaction costs on Katana.so average $0.02 per operation due to Solana’s low gas fees. The platform batches transactions when possible, reducing individual user costs by approximately 40% compared to executing strategies manually. For a $10,000 deposit earning 20% APY, you’d pay $200 in management fees plus $360 in performance fees annually, resulting in net returns of 14.4%.

Fee calculations occur transparently on-chain, with smart contracts automatically deducting fees before distributing yields to users. Unlike some competitors that charge fees on total assets regardless of performance, Katana’s performance fee structure ensures you only pay when strategies generate positive returns. This approach particularly benefits users during market downturns when yields compress across the DeFi ecosystem.

Comparing Top Solana Yield Platforms

When you’re evaluating yield platforms on Solana, understanding how each protocol approaches yield generation makes all the difference. The three platforms below each bring distinct strategies and features that set them apart in the competitive DeFi landscape.

Marinade Finance

Marinade Finance stands as Solana’s largest liquid staking protocol with over $1.2 billion in total value locked. The platform converts your SOL into mSOL tokens that automatically earn staking rewards while remaining liquid for use across DeFi protocols.

Your mSOL appreciates against SOL at approximately 7.2% APY through validator rewards. Marinade distributes stake across 450+ validators using an algorithmic delegation strategy that prioritizes network decentralization. This approach contrasts with Katana.so’s active vault management, as Marinade focuses purely on maximizing staking efficiency.

The protocol charges zero deposit or withdrawal fees. You pay only a 2% commission on staking rewards—significantly lower than traditional staking pools that charge 5-10%. Your mSOL tokens integrate seamlessly with lending protocols like Solend and margin trading platforms like Mango Markets.

Marinade’s automated rebalancing occurs every epoch (approximately 2-3 days) without your intervention. The protocol removes underperforming validators and adds new ones based on performance metrics including uptime, commission rates, and geographic distribution.

Tulip Protocol

Tulip Protocol pioneered leveraged yield farming on Solana by allowing you to borrow assets against your deposits to amplify returns. The platform manages over $500 million across lending pools and yield farming vaults.

Your deposits earn base lending APY plus additional rewards from leveraged positions. For example, depositing 100 SOL in the SOL-USDC vault at 3x leverage generates returns on 300 SOL worth of liquidity provision. Historical data shows leveraged strategies producing 15-85% APY depending on market conditions and chosen leverage ratios.

The protocol implements dynamic interest rate models that adjust borrowing costs based on utilization. You pay interest rates ranging from 5% to 45% APY on borrowed funds. Tulip’s auto-compound feature reinvests earned tokens every 6 hours, maximizing your compound returns without manual intervention.

Risk management tools include position health monitoring and automatic deleveraging when collateral ratios approach liquidation thresholds. Your position remains safe above 85% health factor, with email alerts available for positions dropping below 90%.

Francium Protocol

Francium Protocol specializes in delta-neutral strategies that generate yield while minimizing exposure to price movements. The platform manages $280 million across pseudo-delta-neutral vaults and leveraged farming positions.

Your assets in Francium’s delta-neutral vaults earn 8-25% APY through a combination of farming rewards and funding rate arbitrage. The protocol automatically hedges price exposure by maintaining balanced long and short positions across perpetual futures markets.

The platform’s unique “Onestep Leverage” feature simplifies complex DeFi strategies into single-click operations. You select desired leverage (up to 3x) and target APY, then Francium handles borrowing, swapping, and liquidity provision automatically.

Fee structures vary by strategy complexity. Basic vaults charge 10% performance fees on profits, while leveraged strategies include additional borrowing costs. Transaction fees average $0.15 per operation due to the multiple protocol interactions required for delta-neutral positioning.

Francium’s risk dashboard displays real-time metrics including position delta, funding rates, and impermanent loss calculations. The protocol rebalances positions every 4 hours to maintain neutral exposure, protecting your capital during volatile market conditions.

Security and Audit Comparisons

When you’re putting your SOL tokens into any yield platform, security stands as your primary concern. The crypto space has witnessed countless hacks and exploits, making thorough security audits non-negotiable for any serious investor.

Katana.so underwent three independent security audits before launching on mainnet in early 2024. Neodyme, a Solana-specialized security firm, conducted the primary audit focusing on smart contract vulnerabilities. They examined 4,200 lines of code and identified two medium-severity issues that Katana’s team resolved before deployment. OtterSec performed a secondary review specifically targeting the Options Vault implementation, while Halborn Security validated the platform’s risk management systems.

Tulip Protocol maintains an impressive security track record with audits from Kudelski Security and Bramah Systems. Since 2021, the platform has processed over $2.8 billion in total value locked without experiencing any major security incidents. Their leveraged farming contracts underwent stress testing that simulated extreme market conditions, including 90% price drops within 24-hour periods.

Francium Protocol distinguishes itself through its partnership with Immunefi, offering bug bounties up to $500,000 for critical vulnerabilities. The platform’s delta-neutral strategies received dedicated audits from CertiK in Q3 2023, focusing on the automated hedging mechanisms that protect user funds during market volatility.

Platform	Primary Auditor	Audit Date	Bug Bounty	Security Incidents
Katana.so	Neodyme	Jan 2024	$100,000	None
Tulip Protocol	Kudelski	Nov 2023	$250,000	None
Francium	CertiK	Sep 2023	$500,000	None
Raydium	Trail of Bits	Aug 2023	$200,000	1 (minor, 2022)

Raydium’s concentrated liquidity contracts underwent examination by Trail of Bits, one of blockchain’s most respected security firms. The audit uncovered four low-severity issues related to edge cases in liquidity calculations. Raydium addressed these concerns through a series of updates deployed between August and October 2023.

Access control mechanisms vary significantly across platforms. Katana.so implements a 3-of-5 multisignature wallet for protocol upgrades, with signers distributed across different geographic regions. Administrative functions require a 72-hour timelock, giving users ample time to withdraw funds if they disagree with proposed changes.

Insurance coverage represents another critical security layer. Katana.so partners with Nexus Mutual to offer optional coverage protecting against smart contract failures. Users can purchase coverage for up to 90% of their deposited value at rates starting from 2.6% annually. Tulip Protocol integrates with InsurAce, providing similar protection at competitive rates.

Real-time monitoring systems actively protect user funds across all platforms. Katana.so employs Forta Network agents that scan for anomalous transactions every 400 milliseconds. These automated systems can pause vault operations within seconds if suspicious activity gets detected. Francium utilizes OpenZeppelin Defender for similar monitoring capabilities, while maintaining manual override controls for emergency situations.

The transparency of security practices differs markedly between platforms. Katana.so publishes monthly security reports detailing any incidents, near-misses, or system upgrades. These reports include metrics such as false positive rates (currently 0.3%) and average response times to potential threats (under 15 seconds). Tulip Protocol maintains a public incident log accessible through their governance forum, though updates occur less frequently.

Oracle security deserves special attention given its role in preventing price manipulation attacks. Katana.so sources price data from Pyth Network with secondary validation from Switchboard Oracle. This dual-oracle approach requires both feeds to agree within a 0.5% threshold before executing trades. Raydium takes a different approach, relying primarily on its own on-chain price discovery mechanism supplemented by Chainlink price feeds for less liquid assets.

Smart contract upgradeability presents both opportunities and risks. Katana.so’s vaults use proxy contracts allowing bug fixes without requiring users to migrate funds. However, upgrade authority remains locked behind the multisig wallet and timelock mentioned earlier. Francium opts for immutable contracts in their core protocol, sacrificing flexibility for enhanced security guarantees.

Pros and Cons of Each Platform

When you’re deciding where to park your SOL tokens for yield farming, understanding each platform’s strengths and limitations becomes crucial. After spending months testing these protocols and analyzing their performance metrics, you’ll find that each platform serves different investor profiles and risk appetites.

Katana.so Advantages and Limitations

Katana.so’s automated vault system removes the complexity from yield farming, making it particularly attractive if you prefer a hands-off approach. The platform’s automatic rebalancing saves you from constantly monitoring positions – the SOL Stablecoin Vault adjusts allocations between 30% and 70% based on market volatility without your intervention. Performance data from March 2024 shows these vaults maintained positive returns even during the 23% SOL price correction that month.

The non-custodial architecture means you retain control of your assets through your wallet connection. Smart contracts execute strategies automatically, but you can withdraw funds at any time without penalty periods or lockups. This flexibility proves valuable during market uncertainty when you might need quick access to capital.

Fee transparency stands out as another advantage. The 2% management fee applies annually, while the 20% performance fee only triggers on profits above your initial deposit. During Q2 2024, when yields compressed across DeFi protocols, Katana users paid zero performance fees on vaults that didn’t exceed their deposit values.

However, Katana.so faces certain limitations. The platform currently supports fewer asset pairs compared to competitors – 12 active vaults versus Tulip Protocol’s 47 farming pools. Strategy customization remains minimal; you can’t adjust risk parameters or exclude specific protocols from vault strategies. The Options Vault, while generating 18-32% APY, requires understanding of covered call mechanics that might intimidate newer DeFi users.

Liquidity constraints occasionally impact larger deposits. Vaults implement deposit caps ranging from $500,000 to $2 million per strategy to maintain optimal performance. During high-demand periods in April 2024, the SOL-USDC vault reached capacity within 4 hours of raising its cap.

Alternative Platforms Strengths and Weaknesses

Tulip Protocol excels at providing granular control over leveraged positions. You can adjust leverage ratios from 1.5x to 3x across different pools, potentially amplifying returns significantly. The platform’s 47 farming pools offer exposure to emerging tokens and exotic pairs unavailable elsewhere. Real-time health monitoring displays your liquidation risk percentage, updating every block to help prevent unexpected closures.

Yet Tulip’s complexity creates a steeper learning curve. Managing leveraged positions requires constant attention – a 15% price swing can trigger liquidations if you’re running 3x leverage. The platform’s fee structure compounds costs through borrowing interest (8-25% APR) plus protocol fees, reducing net returns especially during sideways markets.

Francium Protocol’s delta-neutral strategies shine during volatile periods. By automatically hedging price exposure, these vaults generated consistent 15% average returns throughout 2024’s market swings. The platform’s user interface presents complex strategies simply, showing projected returns and risk metrics on a single dashboard.

Francium’s limitations appear in opportunity cost during bull markets. Delta-neutral strategies cap upside potential – while SOL appreciated 67% from January to May 2024, Francium’s hedged vaults returned only 8.2% during the same period. Strategy execution depends on perpetual futures liquidity, occasionally causing slippage above 0.5% on larger positions.

Raydium’s concentrated liquidity features enable precise range setting for maximum capital efficiency. You can earn fees from a narrow price range, potentially achieving 5-10x higher returns than traditional AMM positions. The platform processes over $100 million daily volume, ensuring deep liquidity for major pairs.

The downside emerges through active management requirements. Concentrated positions fall out of range frequently – data shows the average position requires adjustment every 8-12 days to maintain earnings. Gas costs for rebalancing average $0.15-0.30 per transaction, eating into profits for smaller positions under $5,000.

Marinade Finance offers the simplest entry point through liquid staking. Converting SOL to mSOL takes one transaction, earning 7.2% APY automatically. The protocol’s $1.2 billion TVL provides instant liquidity for unstaking without the typical 2-3 day waiting period.

However, Marinade’s single-strategy approach limits yield potential. The 7.2% return trails more active strategies by 5-25% annually. Smart contract risk concentrates in one protocol rather than diversifying across multiple platforms like Katana’s vault approach. Commission fees from validator selection reduce yields by approximately 0.4% compared to direct staking.

Which Platform Is Right for Your Portfolio?

Choosing the right yield platform on Solana comes down to understanding your investment goals and risk tolerance. You’ve seen the features, performance metrics, and security measures of each platform—now let’s figure out which one aligns with your portfolio strategy.

If you’re new to yield farming or prefer a hands-off approach, Katana.so offers the most straightforward path to earning returns. The automated vault system handles all the complex rebalancing and strategy execution, meaning you can deposit your SOL and let the protocol work. This approach works particularly well if you’re investing between $1,000 and $50,000, where the 2% management fee remains reasonable compared to the time you’d spend managing positions manually.

For investors with larger portfolios exceeding $100,000, the fee structures become more important. Marinade Finance’s zero-fee model for liquid staking makes it attractive for conservative investors who want exposure to SOL staking rewards without additional costs. You’re looking at steady 7.2% returns without management or performance fees cutting into your profits.

Your risk appetite plays a crucial role in platform selection. Conservative investors typically find success with Francium’s delta-neutral strategies, which generated 15% APY while protecting against market volatility. These strategies work best during uncertain market conditions when you want yield without directional exposure to SOL price movements.

Aggressive investors often gravitate toward Tulip Protocol’s leveraged yield farming options. If you’re comfortable managing liquidation risks and monitoring health factors, the potential 85% APY during favorable market conditions can significantly boost portfolio returns. Remember that leverage amplifies both gains and losses—a 30% market downturn could trigger liquidations if you’re running 3x leverage positions.

Market conditions also influence platform choice. During bull markets, Raydium’s concentrated liquidity positions can generate exceptional returns, especially if you’re actively managing your ranges. In bear markets, Katana.so’s Options Vault has shown resilience, maintaining 18-32% APY through covered call strategies that benefit from elevated volatility.

Time commitment matters too. Active traders who check positions daily find value in Raydium’s granular controls and real-time data feeds. If you’re checking your portfolio weekly or monthly, Katana.so’s automated strategies or Marinade’s liquid staking provide better fits since they don’t require constant attention.

Technical expertise influences your platform options. Beginners benefit from Katana.so’s simplified interface and preset strategies. Experienced DeFi users can maximize returns through Tulip Protocol’s advanced features like custom leverage ratios and multi-protocol farming strategies.

Capital efficiency considerations vary by platform. Small portfolios under $5,000 work well with Katana.so since the protocol automatically compounds returns and minimizes transaction costs. Larger portfolios above $50,000 can justify the complexity of managing multiple positions across Tulip Protocol or Raydium to squeeze out additional percentage points of yield.

Your timeline affects strategy selection too. Short-term investors (under 3 months) might prefer Raydium’s flexibility to enter and exit positions quickly. Long-term investors (6+ months) benefit from Katana.so’s compound interest effects and Marinade’s stable staking rewards.

Consider combining platforms for diversification. Many successful investors allocate 40% to Marinade for stable base returns, 30% to Katana.so for automated yield optimization, and 30% to either Tulip or Raydium for higher-risk opportunities. This approach balances security, yield, and liquidity across your portfolio.

Transaction frequency impacts cost efficiency too. High-frequency rebalancing on platforms like Raydium can generate $50-100 monthly in transaction fees for active strategies. Katana.so’s batched transactions and Marinade’s minimal rebalancing keep costs under $5 monthly for most users.

Security priorities guide platform selection as well. Risk-averse investors appreciate Katana.so’s insurance options through Nexus Mutual and Tulip Protocol’s extensive audit history. Those comfortable with smart contract risk might accept Raydium’s newer vaults for potentially higher returns.

Portfolio size breakpoints create natural platform preferences. Under $1,000: Marinade’s simplicity and zero fees make sense. $1,000-$10,000: Katana.so’s automation justifies the fees. $10,000-$100,000: Diversify across multiple platforms. Above $100,000: Custom strategies across all platforms maximize returns while managing risk.

Conclusion

Your choice between Katana.so and other Solana yield platforms ultimately depends on your unique investment profile and goals. Whether you’re drawn to Katana’s automated approach or prefer the hands-on control of leveraged strategies will shape which platform serves you best.

The evolving DeFi landscape on Solana continues to present new opportunities and challenges. As protocols innovate and market dynamics shift you’ll need to stay informed about platform updates and emerging risks.

Consider starting with smaller positions to test different platforms before committing significant capital. Track your results across multiple protocols and adjust your strategy based on actual performance rather than projected yields.

Remember that the highest APY isn’t always the best choice if it comes with excessive risk or hidden costs. Focus on sustainable returns that align with your risk tolerance and investment timeline. Your success in Solana yield farming depends less on picking the “perfect” platform and more on developing a disciplined approach to managing your DeFi portfolio.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Katana.so and how does it work?

Katana.so is an automated yield optimization protocol on Solana that manages crypto assets through sophisticated vaults. It connects to decentralized exchanges and lending protocols, deploying assets across multiple DeFi platforms to maximize returns. The platform uses automated strategies that continuously rebalance assets without requiring constant user monitoring, making it ideal for passive investors.

What are the fees for using Katana.so?

Katana.so charges a 2% annual management fee and takes 20% of generated profits as performance fees. These fees only apply to profits above your initial deposit, meaning you don’t pay performance fees during losses. Transaction costs average just $0.02 per operation, and all fees are transparently calculated on-chain.

How does Katana.so compare to other Solana yield platforms?

Katana.so offers automated strategies with 8-45% APY, while competitors vary significantly. Tulip Protocol provides leveraged farming with 15-85% APY but requires more active management. Francium focuses on delta-neutral strategies (8-25% APY) for stability, and Marinade Finance offers simple liquid staking at 7.2% APY with no fees.

Is Katana.so secure and audited?

Yes, Katana.so underwent three independent security audits from Neodyme, OtterSec, and Halborn Security before mainnet launch. The platform uses multisignature wallets, dual-oracle systems, and partners with Nexus Mutual for optional insurance coverage. Monthly security reports ensure transparency and ongoing security monitoring.

Which yield platform should I choose for my investment goals?

Choose based on your needs: Katana.so for automated, hands-off investing; Marinade Finance for conservative, zero-fee staking; Tulip Protocol for aggressive leveraged strategies; or Francium for stability during volatile markets. Consider your risk tolerance, time commitment, and technical expertise when selecting a platform.

What returns can I expect from Katana.so vaults?

Katana.so’s vaults have delivered varying returns since early 2024. The SOL Stablecoin Vault averaged 12.4% APY, while the Options Vault generated 18-32% APY. Overall returns range from 8% to 45% APY depending on market conditions and the specific vault strategy chosen.